Home / Research Commentary

Research Commentary

Research commentaries are short, carefully cited, 800+ word pieces by Sociologists and/or sociology students. Research commentaries are sociological analysis of current events, topics of interest, or ever green issues that are grounded in the sociological literature. Anybody with some degree of sociological knowledge can submit a commentary, but submission are reviewed for the quality of writing, quality of citation, readability, grammar, expressive clarity, and so on. Please consult our Writing Tips section prior to submitting your article. Email your submission to [email protected], along with a quick biographical background statement telling us who you are. If your submission is accepted you will be required to register a username on this site in order that your contribution might be properly attributed.

Radicalization – Causes and Consequences

Yesterday, 7th of July 2013 was the eighth anniversary of the terrorist attack in London. The attacks led the British government to launch initiatives to identify why and how one becomes radicalized[1] and develop measures to counter the terrorism threat. ...

Read More »

Sociology versus Psychology – The Social Context of Psychological Pathology and Child Abuse

report-child-abuse

What does Psychology, Sociology, Behaviourism, and emotional, psychological, physical, and spiritual abuse have to do with each other? A concern with uplifting the human being, transcending pain and suffering, and moving towards holistic health and wellbeing. Or not. Sometimes it is just about command, control, and fitting people into the System. But not here, and not from now on. The winds of change are blowing, a hurricane is coming, and no amount of self delusion, self deception, or social propaganda are going to turn those winds away.

Read More »

Redefining Reality: Seeing is Disbelieving

Good Science

Epistemology = How do we know the world that we know? Ontology = What is the nature of the world that we know? In this short article Dr. Tim argues not only that the world is a materialist presence that exists independent of our observation (his ontological statement), but that this materialist presence can be known basically through a process of empirical trial and error. The empirical trial and error is necessary because the human is fallible, given to delusion, and open to manipulation and contrivance. That much is true, we are too easy to fool it seems. But is that in our nature, or is it a function of our flawed socialization process? That's the rub. Personally, I think socialization but then hey, this a Sociology journal and I'm a sociologist, so maybe I'm biased (or maybe, it is the Truth).

Read More »