Social Model of Disability
Dr. Michael Sosteric | Nov 29, 2010 | Comments 1
Please, Can you explain about the social model of disability which is very different to the social model of care and social model of health. Thank you, Alia No related posts.
Please, Can you explain about the social model of disability which is very different to the social model of care and social model of health. Thank you, Alia
Filed Under: Ask a Sociologist
About the Author: I'm a sociologist at Athabasca University where I coordinate,amongst other things, the introductory sociology courses (Sociology I and Sociology II). FYI I did my dissertation in the political economy of scholarly communication (you can read it if you want). It's not that bad.
My current interests lie in the area of scholarly communication and pedagogy, the sociology of spirituality and religion, consciousness research, entheogens, inequality and stratification, and the revolutionary potential of authentic spirituality.
The Socjourn is my pet project. It started as the Electronic Journal of Sociology but after watching our social elites systematically dismantle the potential of eJournals to alter the politics and economies of scholarly communication, I decided I'd try something a little different. That something is The Socjourn, a initiative that bends the rules of scholarly communication and pedagogy by disregarding academic ego and smashing down the walls that divide our little Ivory Tower world from the rest of humanity.
If you are a sociologist or a sociology student and you have a burning desire to engage in a little institutional demolition by perhaps writing for the Socjourn, contact me. If you are a graduate student and you have some ideas that you think I might find interesting, contact me. I supervise graduate students through Athabasca Universities MAIS program.
What to know about the nature of money, the value of money, and money's role in our modern economies of exchange, then download The Rocket Scientists' Guide to Money and the Economy and let the truth set you free. [
Sociology for the revolutionary in you.
Wikipedia has a good article on this.
Basically, the social model of disability is an attempt to question the entire rubric covered by the term “disability.” It basically comes down to the question, “who are we (and by “we” I mean those who are not “disabled”) to apply the term “disabled” to somebody who does not function as “normal.” When “we” do this, we take a particular view of what it means to be “normal,” and a particular stance on what it means to be functioning, and apply that globally to everyone despite the fact that many people don’t fit into our social idea of what is “normal.”
The following quote sums it up succinctly.
“Disability refers to the social effects of physical or mental impairment. This definition, known as the ‘social model’ of disability, makes a clear distinction between the impairment itself (such as a medical condition that makes a person unable to walk) and the disabling effects of society in relation to that impairment. In simple terms, it is not the inability to walk that prevents a person entering a building unaided but the existence of stairs that are inaccessible to a wheelchair-user. In other words, ‘disability’ is socially constructed. The ‘social model’ is often contrasted with the ‘medical model’ which sees ‘disability’ as synonymous with ‘impairment.’” (ref)
There is a lot of merit in this position. Although we might like to invoke “costs” and “survival of the fittest” archetypes to justify our failure to provide accessible building entrances, or other accommodations needed to ensure individuals are not placed outside the boundaries of our social and political existence, when you think about we (and by “we” I mean normal people) are always building technological accommodations. Next time you look at a building site and see workers hauling materials using a crane, ask yourself, are these workers “disabled” because they cannot lift one ton blocks. Are they disabled because their muscles cannot handle that much weight and they therefore need a technological accommodation (iron, steel, and hydraulics) to be able to manager it? The answer is of course, no. We the “normals” see a limitation of the physical body, we create a social/technological accommodation to overcome that. We fail to do that in the case of those outside the parameters of “normal” not because we cannot ,make the accommodations, but because we apply the label “disabled” and thereby obviate ourselves of the responsibility of providing accomodations even when it is possible, desirable, and ethically necessary.